000			03734cam a22003498i 4500
001			21861341
003			MYCC
005			20250106100133.0
008			210107s2021 enk b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781108843010 _q(hardback)
020			_z9781108913706 _q(ebook)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dMYCC
082	0	0	_a346.04/8 _223
090	0	0	_a346.048 _bBRI 2021
100	1		_aBrinsmead, Simon, _d1975- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aEssential interoperability standards : _binterfacing intellectual property and competition in international economic law / _cSimon Brinsmead, Office of International Law, Attorney-General's Department (Australia).
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2021.
300			_axxiv, 402 pages. _c24cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aCambridge international trade and economic law
500			_aBased on author's thesis (doctoral - Universität Bern, 2018).
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Standards and interoperability standards -- Interoperability standards and international economic law -- Interoperability standards and intellectual property -- Interoperability standards and competition law -- Exclusive property rules or liability rules for interoperability standards and standards essential intellectual property? -- Access to interoperability standards and standards-essential intellectual property : international dimensions -- Concluding observations -- Draft expert manual.
520			_a"The present book, based upon a doctoral thesis submitted to the University of Bern, Switzerland, carefully and extensively addresses the legal challenges encountered in the field of standards-essential intellectual property (SEIP), and in particular of standards-essential patents (SEP). Dr Brinsmead analyses different school of thought and approaches in case law, in particular in the EU, the US and China. He carefully studies the background in international law and domestic law, in particular competition law. While the EU and China essentially rely upon competition law and in result on the essential facility doctrine containing the abuse of a dominant position, the US approach essentially relies upon restrictions inherent to intellectual property, in particular fair use and compulsory licensing. The book expounds the relevant case law in these jurisdictions and discusses pro and cons of different approaches, taking into account the literature on law and economics. It offers a wealth of information on the timely subject, from surveys of relevant international law to detailed accounts of the case law. It includes a pertinent history of the essential facility doctrine and thus of the relationship of intellectual property and competition law on both sides of the Atlantic. The author concludes by supporting an approach based upon inherent but limited restrictions of IP to liability and compensation, as opposed to property rights entitling full injunctions. He suggests developing an expert manual able to guide domestic courts within the framework of existing international law, in particular the TRIPs Agreement of the WTO. A very interesting draft proposal completes the work"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aInternetworking (Telecommunication) _xLaw and legislation
650		0	_aIntellectual property.
650		0	_aAntitrust law.
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _aBrinsmead, Simon, 1975- _tEssential interoperability standards _dCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021 _z9781108913706 _w(DLC) 2021000453
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c201 _d201