<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02526nam a2200361 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">699</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">MYCC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260225133938.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260211s2025    nyu           000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9781954750159</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">paperback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9781954750142</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">ebook</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MYCC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">MYCC</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">343.0721</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">343.0721</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Garnier, Maya-Salom&#xE9;,</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1997-</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">eauthor.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Intent in Competition Law / </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Maya-Salom&#xE9; Garnier ; foreword by David Bosco ; introduction by Catherine Prieto.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">New York :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Concurrences,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2025.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9;2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xxix, 620 pages ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="365" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="e">Gift</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"First Printing, September 2025" -- title page verso</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 521-599) and indexes. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Part 1 The concept of intent -- Title I The historical evolution of intent -- Title II Conceptualizing intent -- Part 2 The role of intent -- Title I The implicit role of intent de lege lata -- Title II The desirable role of intent de lege ferenda  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The law on anti-competitive practices seems to focus, particularly since its "modernization" at the turn of the second millennium-on the economic effects of behavior adopted by undertakings. The effect on competition, the market, or consumer welfare serves as a criterion for both defining and characterizing offenses. At first glance, the discipline appears relatively indifferent to the concept of intent, whose role is commonly minimized or even rejected by both doctrine and case law. Contrary to these preconceptions, this study aims to shed light on the central-albeit implicit-role that intent actually occupies de lege lata. To do so, a historical approach to competition law, an attempt at a general theorization of intent, as well as numerous analogies with criminal law are used. The research ultimately suggests a paradigm shift de lege ferenda. Since the "more economic approach" or "effects-based approach" are not, in practice, as far-reaching as commonly believed, it is proposed to abandon them in favor of a less economic and more legal perspective of competition rules, based on the theory of intent developed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Competition law</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Competition, Unfair</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bosco, David,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">writer of foreword.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Prieto, Catherine, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">writer of introduction.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MYCCLIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MYCCLIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GEN</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-02-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">343.0721 GAR 2025</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">11143</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-02-11 15:17:17</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-02-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">699</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">699</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
