Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com
Image from Google Jackets

The antitrust paradigm : restoring a competitive economy / Jonathan B. Baker.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019Description: 349 pages ; 25 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780674975781
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 338.8/20973 23
Contents:
Part I. The market power paroxysm and the antitrust paradigm: Market power in an era of antitrust -- The faltering political consensus supporting antitrust -- Preventing the political misuse of antitrust -- Recalibrating error costs and presumptions -- Erroneous arguments against enforcement -- Part II. Antitrust rules and the information economy: Inferring agreement and algorithmic coordination -- Exclusionary conduct by dominant platforms -- Threats to innovation from lessened competition -- Harm to suppliers, workers, and platform users -- Part III. Looking forward: Restoring a competitive economy.
Summary: In the 1970s, when the United States economy was struggling and the term "stagflation" was coined to capture inflation plus stagnant business growth, the "Chicago school" critique of antitrust rules gained ascendance. In the 1980s, during Ronald Reagan's two terms as president, that critique's policy prescriptions-the eliminating of or modifying anticompetitive rules to make them less restrictive-became common practice. As Jonathan Baker writes, "The Chicago approach to antitrust can be understood as a gamble. More relaxed antitrust rules would allow firms to achieve greater efficiencies, which would more than compensate for any risk of firms exercising market power. Put differently, the Chicagoans bet that antitrust reform could achieve long term consumer welfare gains without facilitating the creation of substantial and durable market power." The Antitrust Paradigm presents a wealth of evidence arguing that the Chicagoans lost their bet, and prescribes what should be done about it. Since the 1980s, not only has market power widened, economic productivity decline, and consumer welfare gains been modest at best, but also the economy has changed, most visibly in the information technology and Internet giants that top the financial market's valuation charts. Baker argues that both the failures of antitrust reform and the changed economy demand a new antitrust paradigm, one that restores a competitive economy through strengthened antitrust, recognizes antitrust's political context, and identifies the competitive harms from dominant information technology platforms. His book frames the problem, examines the distinctive competitive problems of the information economy, and concludes with a guide for restoring effective antitrust policies.-- Provided by publisher
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Reference Reference MYCC Library Reference 338.820973 BAK 2011 REF (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan
Books Books MYCC Library General stacks 338.820973 BAK 2011 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available
Books Books MYCC Library General stacks 338.820973 BAK 2011 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available
Books Books MYCC Library General stacks 338.820973 BAK 2011 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Part I. The market power paroxysm and the antitrust paradigm: Market power in an era of antitrust -- The faltering political consensus supporting antitrust -- Preventing the political misuse of antitrust -- Recalibrating error costs and presumptions -- Erroneous arguments against enforcement -- Part II. Antitrust rules and the information economy: Inferring agreement and algorithmic coordination -- Exclusionary conduct by dominant platforms -- Threats to innovation from lessened competition -- Harm to suppliers, workers, and platform users -- Part III. Looking forward: Restoring a competitive economy.

In the 1970s, when the United States economy was struggling and the term "stagflation" was coined to capture inflation plus stagnant business growth, the "Chicago school" critique of antitrust rules gained ascendance. In the 1980s, during Ronald Reagan's two terms as president, that critique's policy prescriptions-the eliminating of or modifying anticompetitive rules to make them less restrictive-became common practice. As Jonathan Baker writes, "The Chicago approach to antitrust can be understood as a gamble. More relaxed antitrust rules would allow firms to achieve greater efficiencies, which would more than compensate for any risk of firms exercising market power. Put differently, the Chicagoans bet that antitrust reform could achieve long term consumer welfare gains without facilitating the creation of substantial and durable market power." The Antitrust Paradigm presents a wealth of evidence arguing that the Chicagoans lost their bet, and prescribes what should be done about it. Since the 1980s, not only has market power widened, economic productivity decline, and consumer welfare gains been modest at best, but also the economy has changed, most visibly in the information technology and Internet giants that top the financial market's valuation charts. Baker argues that both the failures of antitrust reform and the changed economy demand a new antitrust paradigm, one that restores a competitive economy through strengthened antitrust, recognizes antitrust's political context, and identifies the competitive harms from dominant information technology platforms. His book frames the problem, examines the distinctive competitive problems of the information economy, and concludes with a guide for restoring effective antitrust policies.-- Provided by publisher

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) All Rights Reserved.

FOLLOW US ON